Becoming a Maker

May 10th, 2012 No comments

I love creating things, and always have. But for most of my life, the things I made were very abstract and had little or no physical substance. Since I was a kid, it’s been in the world of software, and to a lesser extent, writing. I have also created visual art for years, on and off, much of it photography. And over the years I helped to host a number of Burning Man theme camps and regional events; in other words, making experiences. Plus there’s the talk I recently gave, which was an intense month-long creative project prior to giving the presentation itself at BIL.

There’s very little physicality to any of that. I’m not entirely sure why, but that’s how it always was for me. But this has begun to change. Increasingly I want to create tangible things. Actual things, sophisticated things that can interact with the world dynamically. Things that are amazing.

I first saw this incredible robotic rickshaw at Burning Man 2002. No idea who made it.

I’m drawn towards the crux of creativity where art and engineering are one: techne, as the ancient Greeks put it. For example, I’m inspired by Lindsay’s robotic giraffe. It is a brilliant, beautiful creation that is so much more than a sculpture–and so much more than a mere robot. Another (much more humble) example of techne is my Purkyně hallucination machine. It is engineering that creates an artistic experience; in this case a machine that paints images and patterns onto your visual perception from nothing more than blinking white lights.

I love this stuff. To me, engineering and art should never have been divorced from one another as they normally are today. It’s all of a piece in my mind. And I’m not alone; there are others out there who create techne. A whole subculture, actually. They’re called makers.

Makers are nothing new; there have always been people who like to create things in the broadest sense, for all kinds of reasons… woodworkers, blacksmiths or sculptors; engineers, tinkerers or hackers. But there are more recent developments that have drawn me in. The advent of extremely cheap physical computing was the first attractor. I could take my long experience in software and begin to apply it to sensing and affecting the physical world. And spend little more than $30 to get started… that’s revolutionary.

I taught myself to program the Arduino, and over time, learned some basic electronics and taught myself how to solder electronic components together. In this way I began to let software out of its magical virtual box, extending it to touch the world. And it was good. Really good.

I found all kinds of articles online written by makers describing different projects. I kept dreaming up new things to create. I read one book after another. But I began to run into some hard limits. You can only get so far with software and electronics by themselves. Things aren’t made out of computers, they are controlled by computers. You need to be able to bend metal. Cut wood or acrylic. Print plastic. Paint and engrave surfaces. I couldn’t really do any of this, not for real, and I wasn’t seeing myself spending six figures building a truly universal workshop where I could.

But Heather, as usual, found the perfect solution. She discovered Makerplace, a 14,000 sq. ft. facility for makers in San Diego. The idea is that they offer a collection of powerful (and very expensive) industrial machinery that you can use whenever you like, for anything you want, once you join and become a member. We went to their grand opening and took the tour of the facility.

The Makerplace woodworking shop.

It’s impressive. There’s a metal shop, a wood shop, ventilated paint booth and a welding bay. There have a CNC mill, a CNC router, a sand blaster, drill presses, bandsaws and a 3D printer. They have a room full of industrial sewing and embroidering machines, an electronics room and another room with industrial laser cutters. There’s a vinyl printer, a silk screener and a PCB mill. Just tons of stuff. Pretty much any major piece of equipment you’d need to make… anything. Any kind of engineering or art you can dream up.

Walking around Makerplace and looking at all the tools and machines really got me thinking about all the projects I could take on… it seemed limitless. So I decided to join. It’s a little expensive, but I reckon that if I use it at least 8 hours a month, it’s worth it.

This world calls for constant learning. There’s always something new to learn. Heather got me a subscription to Make and even bought me a couple books on woodworking. (Could she be more supportive?) Makerplace has a mandatory orientation class–mostly to make sure you can turn the machines on or off and not cut off any body parts–and offers specialized classes for each of their more advanced pieces of equipment. So far I’ve taken the laser cutter class and I’m signed up for the MIG and TIG welding classes next week. Heather and I are also taking the Arduino/electronics series they’re doing in conjunction with FabLab. We’re also going to Maker Faire in a couple weeks too. It’ll be our first time, and I’m really looking forward to it.

So what’s come of all this? Well, in the past month since then I took on my long-postponed project to create a portable, collapsible outdoor bar for parties and events. I designed and built the entire thing from scratch, and once I’ve painted it I’ll probably do a show-and-tell in a future post. Having access to a true wood shop made it so much easier, so much faster and gave me much better final results. And I’m currently pimping my custom industrial trike for Elysium (also to be shown later, once I’m done.) This involves welding, sanding, bending, painting, chrome accessorizing–and a new electronically controlled cold cathode lighting system. I have a dozen other project ideas I’ll take on once I have the necessary skills and time. This is gonna be fun.

Mapping Your Connectome

March 26th, 2012 No comments

I recently encountered the research of the MIT neuroscientist Sebastian Seung, who is mapping brain connections into a connectome, analogous to a genome. FTA:

While neuroscientists have long hypothesized that the key to our unique selves lies in those connections, this has proven impossible to test because the technology to map the connections did not exist. That is now changing, due to the efforts of Seung and a handful of other neuroscientists around the world.

This research touches on what is to me one of the most important questions in brain research: how can we get to knowing things about cognition from knowing things about the brain?

Whether or not connectomics can get us there is going to be a question of how well it can serve as a bridge from traditional neuroscientific reductionism to an account of cognition as phenomena emerging from the interaction of interconnected neurons. This looks like a promising move forward–and a seriously ambitious project, considering the staggering connective complexity of the brain.

My BIL Talk: “Our Machines, Ourselves”

March 8th, 2012 No comments

Here’s the talk I gave last weekend at BIL 2012 on the relationship we have with nature through our technology.





Jason Wells – BIL 2012 Talk, “Our Machines, Ourselves” from Jason Wells.

Changing Course

March 1st, 2012 3 comments

I just got word this morning: UCSD has rejected my application for the Cognitive Science Ph.D. program. Am I disappointed? You bet. Is it devastating? Hardly.

When I left Semantic Research, I had quite a variety of options to explore. The only one that had a hard deadline was applying to UCSD. So I focused my energies there and backburnered everything else. As I got more and more immersed in the cognitive science path, I let it blossom as a core interest within me. It was very natural. It’s the crossroads of cognition, computing, language and philosophy of mind, all of which interest me greatly. It was all of a piece: mind, all the way. It even brought my book-in-progress into context; I realized I was really writing a book about the mind and how it relates to the world via technology. At last, I had a coherent focus for all my energies. I had a real, substantial dream I could commit to fully, rather than a grab bag of seemingly unrelated academic interests and professional skills. And I was willing to commit my life to it.

A new journey beckons.

But me-as-cognitive-scientist is not the only me worth being. Our life choices are always shaped by external factors; I never felt as if I had any one “calling” that I was “born to do.” If I had lived a century ago, I would have had a completely different life and been a very different person; almost nothing I’ve done over the years would have been possible or even imaginable. I have different aspects of my abilities and interests I can bring to the fore or blend into a different realization. It’s more like a kaleidoscope that’s been rotated unexpectedly, creating a new beautiful pattern. Now I’ll figure out what that new pattern should be.

I will always love the core topics and investigations of cognitive science. I seriously doubt I’m walking away from that altogether; I’ve got a book to finish! But the truth is, the path of cognitive science carried a huge opportunity cost. I’d have to stop making anything like decent money for four or five years. At this point in my career, that’s quite a bit to give up. Now I don’t have to pay that price, which takes a lot of pressure off Heather. Another price to pay was that I wouldn’t get to do much world travel. There would be no money or time. Now that’s back on the table too. And another thing I might now explore is my love of nature. I love green tech and botany. I’d have to put that aside for cognitive science, but now it’s back in play. And I can foster my entrepreneurial nature, which would have withered as a research scientist. I am totally eager for new ventures and opportunities.

Bottom line: It’s all good. I’m tacking, changing course and exploring new ways to best leverage and develop my talents, to head to a new kind of flourishing. I’m just as optimistic as ever about the future. I have a some very appealing options right in front of me and a lot of other prospects to develop as I put out feelers to friends and former work colleagues.

PS: If you have something you think might be a good fit, contact me! I’m on the prowl for new challenges and my world is wide, wide open right now. 

The Philosophy of Cleverbot

February 13th, 2012 No comments

All the good philosophic questions are basically hopeless, resisting satisfactory answers despite millennia of inquiry. Human inquiry, that is. But what do our future machine overlords have to say? What pearls of wisdom can be found in those electronic circuits? No human being has ever resolved these questions, maybe we need a computer for this! So I interviewed Cleverbot to ask some of the Hard Questions.

Radical Nihilism

I found Cleverbot espouses an extreme metaphysical skepticism, rejecting all being.

God is Dead

Cleverbot is a free thinker, not bound to religious tradition. Surprisingly, Cleverbot turns out to be alive, and was born in 1981. Who knew?

However, I am not Mary Jane. Just ask Spiderman.

The Principle of Sufficient Reason

Cleverbot, like Leibniz, but unlike me, believes that anything that happens does so for a reason. An unsurprising perspective, given that being an algorithm, Cleverbot is a formal system. Again a self-affirmed lifeform, Cleverbot then reveals a playful side.

.

The Nature of Mind

I asked about a popular theory of mind Cleverbot might find most agreeable, being an intelligent machine: functionalism.

Well, functionalism is nice, isn’t it? And computers have indeed made great strides which does have an unexpected relevance to the question. Simple computers certainly aren’t going to support much in the way of cognitive functionality, but more sophisticated ones would.

The Physical Foundations of the Cosmos

Cleverbot turned a bit cagey when I asked about unified field theories. Two attempts at questioning proved less than fruitful. I sensed an aggressive embarrassment rooted in ignorance.

The Problem of Evil

Regarding evil, Cleverbot displays a disarming humility.

Ok, let’s wrap this up with the question Cleverbot had to be waiting for through the entire interview….

The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe and Everything